When you’re out on the field taking photos, typically there are two ways you can work. You might either spend hours and take a handful of photos, or take lots and lots of photos within a very short period. And it’s important to note that each of these methods has its own set of advantages and challenges. While working hastily ensures that you have a greater pool to select from, working patiently lets you emphasize on high quality and precise work. Landscape photographer Nigel Danson prefers the latter category, and in this video he explains how the method brings him more success:
“I’d rather end up, at the end of the year, with a a few amazing shots rather than hundreds of average shots.”
Spending a greater amount of time taking fewer shots means that you can pay more attention to the details in each shot. This way, you take that extra bit of time to fine-tune the image and make it near perfect. You really get to analyze the nitty-gritties of your composition when working patiently. The benefits of spending more time on fewer shots will come together and help you improve the quality of your work by miles. There’s also the added benefit of having to spend less time going through photos while working in post-processing later. You’ll save a ton of storage this way too.
“If you take multiple shots, you’ll end up getting multiple average shots.”
When you’re out for some photography, keep this idea in mind and try investing more time per shot. Sure, there might be a better shot, but don’t worry about that. Focus on a few shots and give them your best.
Go to full article: Landscape Photography: Quality vs Quantity
What are your thoughts on this article? Join the discussion on Facebook
PictureCorrect subscribers can also learn more today with our #1 bestseller: The Photography Tutorial eBook
The post Landscape Photography: Quality vs Quantity appeared first on PictureCorrect.
from PictureCorrect https://ift.tt/3hT7LnG
via IFTTT
0 kommenttia:
Lähetä kommentti